1. Fernandez CV, Kodish E, Weijer C. Informing
study participants of research results: an ethical imperative. IRB.
May-Jun 2003;25:12-19. [go to PubMed]
2. Partridge AH, Winer EP. Informing clinical
trial participants about study results. JAMA. 2002;288:363-365.
[go to PubMed]
3. Ravitsky V, Wilfond BS. Disclosing individual
genetic results to research participants. Am J Bioeth. Nov-Dec
2006;6:8-17. [go to PubMed]
4. Markman M. Providing research participants
with findings from completed cancer-related clinical trials: not
quite as simple as it sounds. Cancer. 2006;106:1421-1424. [go to PubMed]
5. Knoppers BM, Joly Y, Simard J, Durocher F. The
emergence of an ethical duty to disclose genetic research results:
international perspectives. Eur J Hum Genet. 2006;14:1170-1178.
[go to PubMed]
6. Shalowitz DI, Miller FG. Disclosing individual
results of clinical research: implications of respect for
participants. JAMA. 2005;294(6):737-740. [go to PubMed]
7. Meltzer LA. Undesirable implications of
disclosing individual genetic results to research participants. Am
J Bioeth. Nov-Dec 2006;6:28-30; author reply W10-22. [go to PubMed]
8. Bookman EB, Langehorne AA, Eckfeldt JH, et al.
Reporting genetic results in research studies: summary and
recommendations of an NHLBI working group. Am J Med Genet A.
2006;140:1033-1040. [go to PubMed]
9. Partridge AH, Hackett N, Blood E, et al.
Oncology physician and nurse practices and attitudes regarding
offering clinical trial results to study participants. J Natl
Cancer Inst. 2004;96:629-632. [go to PubMed]
10. Fernandez CV, Santor D, Weijer C, et al. The
return of research results to participants: pilot questionnaire of
adolescents and parents of children with cancer. Pediatr Blood
Cancer. 2007;48:441-446. [go to PubMed]
11. Partridge AH, Wong JS, Knudsen K, et al.
Offering participants results of a clinical trial: sharing results
of a negative study. Lancet. 2005;365:963-964. [go to PubMed]
12. Trialists should tell participants results,
but how? Lancet. 2006;367:1030. [go to PubMed]
13. Macneil SD, Fernandez CV. Informing research
participants of research results: analysis of Canadian university
based research ethics board policies. J Med Ethics. 2006;32:49-54.
[go to PubMed]
14. World Medical Association Declaration of
Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human
subjects. JAMA. 2000;284:3043-3045. [go to PubMed]
15. Department of Health and Human Services,
National Institutes of Health, Office for Protection from Research
Risks. Code of Federal Regulations. Title 45, Part 46: Protection
of Human Subjects; 2001.
16. Shah S, Whittle A, Wilfond B, Gensler G,
Wendler D. How do institutional review boards apply the federal
risk and benefit standards for pediatric research? JAMA.
2004;291:476-482. [go to PubMed]
17. Fisher CB, Kornetsky SZ, Prentice ED.
Determining risk in pediatric research with no prospect of direct
benefit: time for a national consensus on the interpretation of
federal regulations. Am J Bioeth. Mar 2007;7:5-10. [go to PubMed]